|
Soul-searching of
Hong Kong amidst confusion about its future - Alex
Chan
Last Saturday, 14 co-signatories of the
Hong Kong Core Values Declaration, including myself, met the
Chief Executive Tung Chee-hwa in his office to address their
common concern. The Declaration, which appeared in two local
newspapers last Monday, received support from 294 academics
and professionals coming from various sectors. They worried
about the erosion of Hong Kong's core values which were exemplified
in several recent incidents, including the Equal Opportunity
Commission scandal, the Harbor Fest saga and the recent move
of the Standing Committee of National People's Congress to
interpret the Basic Law.
Core values as "Hong Kong's lifeline"
The Chief Executive's swift response is to be welcome. In
the meeting, he expressed clear endorsement of all the eight
core values listed in the Declaration (liberty, democracy,
human rights, rule of law, fairness, social equity, care and
compassion, openness and transparency, plurality, respect
for individuals, and upholding professionalism), although
he said other values like filial piety could be added. When
he met the press after the meeting, he described these core
values as "Hong Kong's lifeline."
The Chief Executive's unequivocal support of the Declaration
is, however, surprising. The SAR Government has consistently
maintained that Hong Kong is an economic city. In fact, Tung's
administration has continued to give a public impression that
it takes economic development as the top priority issue, while
other social and political agenda must be put at the back
seat. Personally, the Chief Executive is well known for his
distaste against politics. Does his latest endorsement of
the Hong Kong Core Values Declaration imply a brand new approach
to governing Hong Kong? Or is it merely a matter of political
convenience?
A matter of political convenience?
Since the Central Government responded
with a resounding "no" to the strong call within
the Hong Kong SAR for constitutional development, in particular
universal suffrage, early this year, Vice-President President
Zeng Qinghong proposed a new catchphrase to advise Hong Kong
people. He maintained that "development is the eternal
theme." By this, he meant that Hong Kong should single-mindedly
focus on economic development. He clearly hoped that Hong
Kong people could shift their attention away from political
squabbling about universal suffrage, and grasped the immense
business opportunities which appeared suddenly after the implementation
of CEPA.
The Chief Executive's support of the importance of core values
to Hong Kong's future development squares neither with Vice-President
Zeng's advice. He seems to suggest that Hong Kong people should
defend a broader concept of development, which put emphasis
on care, compassion, equal opportunity, sustainable development
as much as business development.
Confusion about Hong Kong's future direction
Today, Hong Kong people are more than ever
before facing an intellectual confusion about how they conceive
the future direction of this city's development. Political
squabbling about constitutional development and patriotism
is merely the symptom. The Hong Kong Core Values Declaration
can be taken as an attempt to bring a new and broader angle
of thinking about the challenge that Hong Kong people are
facing at this critical point of time, what constituted Hong
Kong's success in the past, and what we need to defend today
so that Hong Kong can continue to thrive in future.
One may suspect the political motivation behind the Chief
Executive's positive endorsement of the Declaration. But anyhow,
if he is right that the core values mentioned in the Declaration
are "Hong Kong's lifeline," we have good reason
to ask him to rethink his definition of Hong Kong's role as
an economic city and the recent call for single-minded focus
on business development.
Alex Wo-shun Chan is a lecturer in the
Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic
University. He is also the Secretary of SynergyNet - a policy
think-tank.
Originally released through SynergyNet's
email bulletin No. 31
June 15, 2004
|